Cricinfo





home


Audio

Video

Slogout

Fantasy

Cricinfo 3D

The Sanga zone

Help and Feedback


 





Live Scorecards
Fixtures | Results
3D Animation






West Indies v Australia
Asia Cup
England v South Africa
County Cricket
ICC Intercontinental Cup

Current and Future Tours



News
Photos | Wallpapers




Cricinfo Magazine








Match/series archive
Records
Statsguru
Players/Officials
Grounds



Women's Cricket
ICC
Rankings/Ratings




Wisden Almanack



Games
Fantasy Cricket
Slogout



Daily Newsletter
Desktop Alerts
Toolbar
Widgets







Feb 2006: Editorial

The need for balance

Sambit Bal



Indian players sport sponsor logos galore on their uniforms © Getty Images

The world of cricket is agog: the new masters of the game in India have bared their commercial agenda, and the reaction to it has been a mixture of awe, fear, anxiety and excitement. Superpowers are rarely known to be egalitarian, and the Indian board is making no apologies about its ambition: it wants to leverage the size of its television market to maximise its earnings and is prepared, almost brazenly, to shake up world cricket for it.

The question is, how far will India go, and where will that lead world cricket? Here's the worst-case scenario: the international cricket calendar, as drawn up by the ICC and agreed to by the member nations, will collapse; the ICC will be rendered powerless and superfluous; cricket will become more insular and elitist; weaker countries will find themselves marginalised and isolated; and bereft of the ICC's resources and leadership, development programmes in these countries will be derailed. These are legitimate concerns. For the sake of the game, India's prosperity cannot be at the cost of world cricket. In any case, such prosperity is doomed to be short-lived.

But despite the blatantly predatory ring there is a veneer of legitimacy to the Indian position, and despite the unilateralism it smacks of, there is a possibility that some good will emerge out of it. Allowing for the bluster and posturing normally associated with hard bargains, a compromise of sorts is inevitable; if everyone plays their cards right, world cricket just might benefit.

India's blunt withdrawal from the Champions Trophy is seen as a direct assault on the authority of the ICC. But the Champions Trophy - the brainchild, ironically, of Jagmohan Dalmiya, to whom the ICC owes its nose for money - has grown to be an unwieldy and unsatisfactory tournament, consuming large chunks of time and producing some gross mismatches. India's major gripe is about the timing of the Champions Trophy, which more often than not eats into India's home season and provides very little commercial benefit in return. Would England agree to spend three weeks playing an ICC tournament in July or Australia one in December, the Indian administrators ask. No tears should be shed if India's tough stand forces a rethink on the viability of a tournament that has been anything but a champions trophy.

The ICC's Future Tours Programme too was crying out for an overhaul. It mandated that every nation play every other nation four times in the space of 10 years, effectively making a mockery of Test cricket since a large number of those matches would involve Bangladesh and Zimbabwe. To retain its relevance and to ensure it stays the supreme form of the game, Test cricket needs to be played between teams that can sustain a competition over five days. India's suggestion that top teams play each other more frequently isn't as pernicious as some make it out to be, even if it is wholly self-serving.

But at the same time, to be taken seriously as a leader, India must learn to behave like one. It is justified in seeking to redress the imbalance in the international calendar, which it finds discriminatory and inimical to its interests, but it must assure the international cricket community that it is prepared to think beyond itself and put its might behind causes that transcend commerce. That sport is big business today is an inescapable reality. But it must not be lost on anyone that there is a fundamental difference between sport and business. Money may be sport's biggest driver, but it is not its soul; cricket needs to make money in order to exist, but it doesn't exist to make money.

To subscribe to Cricinfo Magazine, click here

Sambit Bal is the editor of Cricinfo and Cricinfo Magazine

Add to del.icio.us | digg this | Stumble It What's this?

Access live scores, news and more direct from your browser
Cricinfo Toolbar
NEW fantasy cricket game - England v South Africa (starts July 10)
Login and enter your team now
Cricinfo on the go - our mobile services
WAP and Mobicast
Cricinfo home Print this page Email this page to a friend Feedback

Cricket Minute
Cricinfo Mobile


About this columnist









Related Links



In Focus

Series/Tournaments

Teams

Other






Cricinfo Products
Watch the latest SportsCenter bulletin
On Cricinfo.tv
NEW fantasy game - England v South Africa
Starts July 10
The miracle of India's 1983 World Cup win
Cricinfo looks back
Cricinfo Widgets - new portable applications
Add to your site now

Sponsored Links
Join the Hutch Kumar Sangakkara zone
Interactive fan zone
Send Groceries to your loved ones
in Sri Lanka
New online Sri Lanka Cricket Shop
Buy Murali tribute CD now



 
Top 5 player searches
Most read stories